 |
| 2,200-year-old contract comprised of fragments from Papyrus Carlsberg and British Museum (University of Copenhagen) |
I ran across
an interesting article on Sci-News.com about the practice of voluntary slavery
in ancient Egypt. Over 100 slave contracts reveal that some people enslaved
themselves to a local temple and paid for the privilege. Here is some of what
the article has to say.
Dr Ryholt, who reports the discovery in his article in the forthcoming publication Lotus and Laurel – Studies on Egyptian Language and Religion, said: “90 per cent of the people who entered into these slave contracts were unable to name their fathers, although this was normally required. They were presumably children of prostitutes. This is a clear indication that they belonged to the lower classes which the king could subject to forced labor, for example digging canals, if he so desired. However, we know from other contemporary records that temple slaves were exempt from forced labor.”
“Many therefore chose to live as temple slaves because it was the only way of avoiding the harsh and possibly even deadly alternative; the temple was simply the lesser of two evils for these people. And for the temples, this was a lucrative practice that gave them extra resources and money.”
According to Kim Ryholt, the practice of avoiding forced labor by entering into slave contracts with temples was limited to a 60-year-period – from roughly 190 BC to 130 BC. There is no indication that the practice existed in any other period in ancient Egypt; probably because the royal family could not, in the long run, afford to yield that many resources to the temples.
I found the
article interesting for two reasons: 1) because it documents the practice of
self-slave among slaves and 2) because it points out that the evidence for this
practice is found in a narrow 60 year period. This means that while some slaves
in Egypt did sell themselves, it was not a “common practice” as some suppose. This
is particualry the case in New Testament studies.
I noted in
my Recent Research on Paul and Slavery
that most NT scholars are familiar with the thesis that individuals would sell
themselves into slavery as a way to relieve themselves of debt, improve their
quality of life or even as a means of social improvement. This has also been
sometimes suggested as the background for Paul’s discussion of slavery to sin
and God in Rom. 6:16–22 and his understanding
of slavery to Christ. However, how frequently this form of enslavement was
practiced is not clear.
References to self-sale in the Roman jurists indicate
that individuals who sold themselves into slavery had not only given up their
inalienable right to freedom, but also brought shame upon themselves and their
family (Digest 28.3.6.5; 40.12.1).
Apart from two references in the Jurists, references to self-sale are few and
obscure. Keith Bradley gives little attention to the practice in his work and
comments: “It is generally agreed that self-sale as a mode of enslavement was
of negligible importance in the central period of Roman history.”(‘Roman Slavery and Roman Law’, Reflexions historiques 15 (1988), p. 482).
The only clear allusion to the practice in Christian literature is found
in 1 Clement 55.2. The reference is enigmatic, however, and seems to be
referring more to those who were willing to suffer for others rather than
suggesting that the author was familiar with the practice of self-sale.
Another
allusion is found in Petronius’s Satyricon
where the freedman Trimalchio claims to have sold himself into slavery in order
to improve his social standing. However satire was intended to distort common
social values for the purpose of comedy while reinforcing those values at the
same time. (Glancy, Slavery in Early Christianity, p. 82) This limited evidence for the practice of self-sale should serve as a
caution to NT scholars. Horsley considers this “a good illustration of the
limitation of uncritical use of Roman law as a historical source.”(Horsley,
‘The Slave Systems of Classical Antiquity’, p. 36).
The
discovery of the Egyptian slave contracts certainly demonstrate that some did
sell themselves into slavery to gain a better life. But the contracts also tell
us that this practice was limited to a specific period of time in a particular
geographic area. They do not suggest that self sale was a widespread or even desirable practice. One thing we need to keep in mind when studying this topic
is that slavery, in whatever form or time period, was/is not a positive
experience for the enslaved.
